The promises and pitfalls of decentralized exchanges

Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed herein belong solely to the author and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of crypto.news editorial.

Historically, centralized exchanges like Binance or Coinbase have competed for the title of most popular crypto trading platforms. These exchanges have influenced the landscape of digital asset trading, attracting both newcomers and experienced traders. However, relying on CEXs is not without its drawbacks.

The risks of hacking, operational failures, misuse of funds, and regulatory pressures have led investors to reevaluate their options and explore alternatives that offer greater security and autonomy. This is part of the appeal that drives investors to decentralized finance.

Unlike their centralized counterparts, decentralized exchanges allow users to trade directly from their wallets, giving them full control over their private keys and funds at all times.

It may seem like ancient history, but let’s take a look back at the infamous fall of FTX. As a CEX, FTX was one of the most important centralized platforms in the industry, but its fall from grace was the final straw. After this incident, some traders became convinced that CEXs were too risky, leading them to explore the benefits of other types of platforms.

DEXs reduce the risk of attacks because they do not hold user funds. Instead, transactions occur between users via smart contracts, reducing the threat of cyberattacks. By eliminating the need for centralized intermediaries,

DEXs allow users to trade directly without compromising ownership or security, significantly reducing the risks associated with hacks, scams, and custodial failures. This model provides users with greater asset control while also fostering a more secure trading environment. And investors are starting to take notice.

The DEX to CEX spot trading volume ratio is forecast to reach a new record of 13.76% in July, reflecting the proportion of trading activity occurring on decentralized platforms compared to centralized platforms.

Decentralized exchanges spot trading volume | Source: CoinGecko

Improved liquidity and enhanced user experience are just a few of the factors that are driving cryptocurrency investors to invest their money in a decentralized manner and embrace the truly autonomous and transparent nature of cryptocurrencies. However, DEX platforms have their own shortcomings that they need to address.

With hundreds of DEXs on the market, investors can face challenges like inconsistent liquidity levels, variable transaction fees, and complex user interfaces that deter new users from exploring the emerging ecosystem. As a result, some decentralized platforms have set out to address these weaknesses, such as Astrovault, an automated market maker that aims to generate revenue directly from liquidity pools. Unlike traditional DEX platforms, Astrovault adopts a new operational approach, reducing its reliance on external liquidity sources and providing a more sustainable and resilient model for users to interact with.

Another DEX that ignores the expectations of what a decentralized platform can be used for is QuickSwap, which has become the top asset exchange on Polygon. What’s the key difference here? QuickSwap focuses on practicality by giving users an incentive to use it beyond just trying to generate returns. By offering services like bill payments through the ability to purchase crypto or fiat, it encourages continued usage while promoting the idea of ​​what a DEX can provide to its user base.

While the shift from centralized to decentralized platforms won’t happen overnight, recent developments in the industry highlight the growing momentum toward this change. As technologies evolve, they pave the way for more user-centric and transparent financial systems. This advancement in trading not only increases security, but also gives users more control over their assets.